1-4 are Farzan's original proposal with the number 2/3 agreed as the amount of votes required in favour. I've extended the wording to make it clear, but that's the only change.Agreed Entry Procedures to the Bastion Union
1. Prospective nations request admission.
2. Each Bastion Union nation has the right to raise an objection within a week.
3. If one or more objection is raised, the Bastion Union nations will vote whether to admit the nation or not.
a. If 2/3 or more of Bastion Union nations vote in favour of admitting the prospective nation, it shall be admitted.
4. If no Bastion Union nation has raised an objection within a week, the prospective nation shall be admitted.
5. Organisations and other non-national forums requesting top-level hosting can be added with the approval of one admin or the request of one Bastion Union nation.
5a. This approval can always be revoked by a decision to do so in the Situation Room.
5 is an addition which we have essentially been operating under, but just to confirm it. This is talking about things like Archipelago, MTO, Benancian Conference, Batavian Emergency Forum etc. 5a is just the clause to say that the people of Bastion can always revoke a decision to add something to the top level.
Can we agree on this and sticky it as something to use for future admissions stuff? If people don't like the way I've suggested 5 but are happy with the rest, I have no objections to dropping 5 and continuing to do that ad hoc; I'd just like to have 1-4 agreed.
Also, this would be the appropriate topic to consider the question of whether voting on these sorts of issues should be done by individuals on the forum and not nations.